Case Summary
During the Spring and Autumn period, Duke Xian of Jin favored his concubine Li Ji, who sought to make her own son Xiqi the heir. She falsely accused Crown Prince Shensheng of poisoning his father's food. Despite knowing the truth, Shensheng refused to expose Li Ji to avoid distressing his father, and ultimately committed suicide. His brothers Chong'er and Yiwu were also forced into exile. The incident triggered a brutal succession crisis, destabilizing Jin State for years. The case epitomizes the destructive power of palace intrigue and slander in ancient Chinese politics, where filial piety was manipulated to lethal ends.
Status or Result
No formal trial took place. Shensheng died by suicide. Xiqi was named heir but was soon assassinated in the ensuing chaos. Li Ji's faction was eventually purged, and after years of turmoil, Chong'er returned to rule as Duke Wen of Jin.
Key Disputes
Whether Shensheng truly attempted to poison Duke Xian; whether Li Ji orchestrated the entire slander; and the moral dilemma between exposing the truth and preserving filial piety.
Social Impact
The case deepened the tradition of caution against consort interference in succession. It demonstrated how slander could destroy a legitimate heir and trigger civil strife. The exile of Chong'er eventually led to the rise of Duke Wen, one of the Five Hegemons of Spring and Autumn, reshaping Jin's history and reinforcing the moral lesson that unchecked inner-court scheming corrodes state foundations.
Adapted Novels (1)
Feedback & Corrections


No comments yet. Be the first to comment!