American & Euro Cases

Courtroom suspense and legal investigations based on famous American and European trials.

1. Pope v. Robinson et al

2. Jurisdiction: United States (June 12, 2023)
3. Victims<![CDATA[Pope]]>Defendants<![CDATA[Robinson]]>Plaintiffs<![CDATA[Pope]]>Investigators<![CDATA[无]]>Prosecutors<![CDATA[无]]>Defense Attorneys<![CDATA[无]]>Plaintiff Attorneys<![CDATA[无]]>Judges<![CDATA[无]]>Institutions<![CDATA[U.S. District Court]]>
4. Case Tags: Excessive Force;Qualified Immunity;Civil Rights Violation;Police Misconduct

1. Littleton v. T-Mobile USA Inc et al

2. Jurisdiction: United States (September 19, 2023)
3. Defendants<![CDATA[T-Mobile USA Inc]]>Plaintiffs<![CDATA[Angela Littleton]]><![CDATA[Debra Allen]]><![CDATA[Jerry O'Connor]]>Plaintiff Attorneys<![CDATA[Derek W. Loeser]]><![CDATA[Gretchen Freeman Cappio]]><![CDATA[Lynn Lincoln Sarko]]>Judges<![CDATA[Robert S. Lasnik]]>Institutions<![CDATA[United States District Court for the Western District of Washington]]><![CDATA[T-Mobile USA Inc]]>
4. Case Tags: Class Action;Consumer Protection;False Advertising;Telecommunications Law

1. Spradley v. United States of America

2. Jurisdiction: United States of America (September 19, 2023)
3. Victims<![CDATA[无]]>Defendants<![CDATA[United States of America]]>Plaintiffs<![CDATA[Spradley]]>Investigators<![CDATA[无]]>Prosecutors<![CDATA[无]]>Defense Attorneys<![CDATA[无]]>Plaintiff Attorneys<![CDATA[无]]>Judges<![CDATA[无]]>Institutions<![CDATA[United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit]]>
4. Case Tags: Federal Employment Law;Annuity Calculation;Administrative Appeal;Federal Circuit Decision

1. Pyron诉社会保障管理局局长案

2. Jurisdiction: 美国 (2023年9月20日)
3. Original Case: Pyron v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
4. Victims<![CDATA[无]]>Defendants<![CDATA[Social Security Administration, Commissioner]]>Plaintiffs<![CDATA[Sheila Pyron]]>Investigators<![CDATA[无]]>Prosecutors<![CDATA[无]]>Defense Attorneys<![CDATA[无]]>Plaintiff Attorneys<![CDATA[无]]>Judges<![CDATA[Staci G. Cornelius]]>Institutions<![CDATA[United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama]]><![CDATA[Social Security Administration]]>
5. Case Tags: 行政法;社会保障残疾保险;补充保障收入;残疾福利

1. Gould v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner

2. Jurisdiction: United States (September 21, 2023)
3. Victims<![CDATA[无]]>Defendants<![CDATA[Social Security Administration, Commissioner]]>Plaintiffs<![CDATA[Gould]]>Investigators<![CDATA[无]]>Prosecutors<![CDATA[无]]>Defense Attorneys<![CDATA[无]]>Plaintiff Attorneys<![CDATA[无]]>Judges<![CDATA[无]]>Institutions<![CDATA[Social Security Administration]]><![CDATA[United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit]]>
4. Status or Result: 美国第一巡回上诉法院维持了下级法院的判决，裁定行政法法官的决定有实质证据支持，驳回了原告的上诉。
5. Case Tags: Social Security Disability;Administrative Law;Appellate Procedure;Substantial Evidence Standard

1. Bullock v. Social Security Administration

2. Jurisdiction: United States (September 21, 2023)
3. Victims<![CDATA[无]]>Defendants<![CDATA[Social Security Administration]]>Plaintiffs<![CDATA[Bullock]]>Investigators<![CDATA[无]]>Prosecutors<![CDATA[无]]>Defense Attorneys<![CDATA[无]]>Plaintiff Attorneys<![CDATA[无]]>Judges<![CDATA[无]]>Institutions<![CDATA[Social Security Administration]]>
4. Case Tags: Social Security Appeal;Disability Insurance Benefits;Civil Administrative Law;Judicial Review

1. Williams v. United States of America

2. Jurisdiction: United States of America (March 27, 2023)
3. Victims<![CDATA[无]]>Defendants<![CDATA[United States of America]]>Plaintiffs<![CDATA[Williams]]>Investigators<![CDATA[无]]>Prosecutors<![CDATA[无]]>Defense Attorneys<![CDATA[无]]>Plaintiff Attorneys<![CDATA[无]]>Judges<![CDATA[无]]>Institutions<![CDATA[无]]>
4. Case Tags: Federal Tort Claims Act;Constitutional Law;Civil Procedure;Government Liability

1. Collins v. Peco Foods Inc.

2. Jurisdiction: United States (September 22, 2023)
3. Victims<![CDATA[Brenda Collins]]>Defendants<![CDATA[Peco Foods Inc.]]>Plaintiffs<![CDATA[Brenda Collins]]>Investigators<![CDATA[Equal Employment Opportunity Commission]]>Prosecutors<![CDATA[无]]>Defense Attorneys<![CDATA[无]]>Plaintiff Attorneys<![CDATA[无]]>Judges<![CDATA[无]]>Institutions<![CDATA[United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama]]><![CDATA[Equal Employment Opportunity Commission]]>
4. Case Tags: Employment Discrimination;Title VII of the Civil Rights Act;Poultry Industry Litigation;EEOC Enforcement

1. Mcmullen-Bey v. United States of America

2. Jurisdiction: United States of America (September 25, 2023)
3. Victims<![CDATA[无]]>Defendants<![CDATA[United States of America]]>Plaintiffs<![CDATA[Mcmullen-Bey]]>Investigators<![CDATA[无]]>Prosecutors<![CDATA[无]]>Defense Attorneys<![CDATA[无]]>Plaintiff Attorneys<![CDATA[无]]>Judges<![CDATA[无]]>Institutions<![CDATA[United States District Court for the Western District of Washington]]>
4. Case Tags: Sovereign Citizen;Pro Se Litigation;Case Dismissal;Moorish American

1. Moore v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner

2. Jurisdiction: 美国 (2023-09-25)
3. Victims<![CDATA[无]]>Defendants<![CDATA[Kilolo Kijakazi]]>Plaintiffs<![CDATA[Moore]]>Investigators<![CDATA[无]]>Prosecutors<![CDATA[无]]>Defense Attorneys<![CDATA[无]]>Plaintiff Attorneys<![CDATA[无]]>Judges<![CDATA[无]]>Institutions<![CDATA[Social Security Administration]]><![CDATA[United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit]]>
4. Status or Result: 撤销地方法院判决，将案件发回社会保障署重审，要求行政法法官重新全面评估医学证据与原告陈述。
5. Case Tags: 社会保障残疾保险;实质证据标准;医疗意见评估;联邦上诉

1. Pendley v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner

2. Jurisdiction: United States (September 25, 2023)
3. Victims<![CDATA[无]]>Defendants<![CDATA[Kilolo Kijakazi]]>Plaintiffs<![CDATA[Pendley]]>Investigators<![CDATA[无]]>Prosecutors<![CDATA[无]]>Defense Attorneys<![CDATA[无]]>Plaintiff Attorneys<![CDATA[无]]>Judges<![CDATA[无]]>Institutions<![CDATA[Social Security Administration]]><![CDATA[United States District Court]]>
4. Case Tags: Social Security Disability;Administrative Law;Substantial Evidence;Federal Court Review

1. Hudson v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner

2. Jurisdiction: United States (September 25, 2023)
3. Victims<![CDATA[Billy R. Hudson]]>Defendants<![CDATA[Social Security Administration]]>Plaintiffs<![CDATA[Billy R. Hudson]]>Investigators<![CDATA[无]]>Prosecutors<![CDATA[无]]>Defense Attorneys<![CDATA[无]]>Plaintiff Attorneys<![CDATA[无]]>Judges<![CDATA[Andrew Lynn Brasher]]>Institutions<![CDATA[United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit]]>
4. Case Tags: Administrative Law;Social Security Disability;Appellate Review;Substantial Evidence Standard

1. Webb et al v. River Birch Park LLC et al

2. Jurisdiction: United States (September 26, 2023)
3. Victims<![CDATA[Webb]]>Defendants<![CDATA[River Birch Park LLC]]>Plaintiffs<![CDATA[Webb]]>Investigators<![CDATA[无]]>Prosecutors<![CDATA[无]]>Defense Attorneys<![CDATA[无]]>Plaintiff Attorneys<![CDATA[无]]>Judges<![CDATA[无]]>Institutions<![CDATA[无]]>
4. Case Tags: Landlord-Tenant Dispute;Premises Liability;Class Action;Housing Law

1. Cockrell v. Pickens County Commission

2. Jurisdiction: United States (September 26, 2023)
3. Victims<![CDATA[无]]>Defendants<![CDATA[Pickens County Commission]]>Plaintiffs<![CDATA[Randall Cockrell]]>Investigators<![CDATA[无]]>Prosecutors<![CDATA[无]]>Defense Attorneys<![CDATA[Matt Clark]]>Plaintiff Attorneys<![CDATA[Monica Miller]]>Judges<![CDATA[R. David Proctor]]>Institutions<![CDATA[Pickens County Commission]]><![CDATA[U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama]]><![CDATA[American Humanist Association]]><![CDATA[Alliance Defending Freedom]]>
4. Case Tags: Constitutional Law;First Amendment;Religious Monuments;Federal Court Ruling

1. Busby v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner

2. Jurisdiction: United States (September 26, 2023)
3. Victims<![CDATA[无]]>Defendants<![CDATA[Kilolo Kijakazi]]>Plaintiffs<![CDATA[Busby]]>Investigators<![CDATA[无]]>Prosecutors<![CDATA[无]]>Defense Attorneys<![CDATA[无]]>Plaintiff Attorneys<![CDATA[无]]>Judges<![CDATA[John H. England III]]>Institutions<![CDATA[Social Security Administration]]><![CDATA[United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama]]>
4. Case Tags: Social Security Disability;ALJ Error;Federal Court Review;Substantial Evidence

1. Frankin v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner

2. Jurisdiction: United States (September 26, 2023)
3. Victims<![CDATA[无]]>Defendants<![CDATA[Social Security Administration, Commissioner]]>Plaintiffs<![CDATA[Frankin]]>Investigators<![CDATA[无]]>Prosecutors<![CDATA[无]]>Defense Attorneys<![CDATA[无]]>Plaintiff Attorneys<![CDATA[无]]>Judges<![CDATA[无]]>Institutions<![CDATA[Social Security Administration]]><![CDATA[United States District Court]]>
4. Case Tags: Social Security Disability;Administrative Law;Disability Benefits Appeal;Substantial Evidence Standard

1. Hoefelman v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner

2. Jurisdiction: United States (September 26, 2023)
3. Victims<![CDATA[无]]>Defendants<![CDATA[Commissioner of Social Security]]>Plaintiffs<![CDATA[Mark Hoefelman]]>Investigators<![CDATA[无]]>Prosecutors<![CDATA[无]]>Defense Attorneys<![CDATA[无]]>Plaintiff Attorneys<![CDATA[无]]>Judges<![CDATA[United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit]]>Institutions<![CDATA[Social Security Administration]]><![CDATA[United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri]]>
4. Case Tags: Social Security Disability Insurance;Administrative Law Judge Hearing;Medical Opinion Evaluation;Federal Appellate Review

1. Gorecki v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner

2. Jurisdiction: United States (2023-09-26)
3. Original Case: Gorecki v. Commissioner of Social Security
4. Victims<![CDATA[无]]>Defendants<![CDATA[Social Security Administration]]>Plaintiffs<![CDATA[Gorecki]]>Investigators<![CDATA[无]]>Prosecutors<![CDATA[无]]>Defense Attorneys<![CDATA[无]]>Plaintiff Attorneys<![CDATA[无]]>Judges<![CDATA[无]]>Institutions<![CDATA[Social Security Administration]]><![CDATA[United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit]]>
5. Case Tags: Social Security Disability;Administrative Law;Disability Benefits Appeal;Sixth Circuit

1. Tuscaloosa Hyundai Inc v. Hyundai Motor America Inc et al

2. Jurisdiction: United States (September 27, 2023)
3. Victims<![CDATA[无]]>Defendants<![CDATA[Hyundai Motor America Inc]]><![CDATA[Genesis Motor America LLC]]>Plaintiffs<![CDATA[Tuscaloosa Hyundai Inc]]>Investigators<![CDATA[无]]>Prosecutors<![CDATA[无]]>Defense Attorneys<![CDATA[无]]>Plaintiff Attorneys<![CDATA[J. Mark White]]><![CDATA[Augusta S. Dowd]]><![CDATA[Christopher S. Kuffner]]>Judges<![CDATA[Liles C. Burke]]>Institutions<![CDATA[United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama]]>
4. Status or Result: 案件尚在审理中，法院尚未做出实质性判决。
5. Case Tags: Contract Dispute;Franchise Law;Direct Sales;Automotive Industry

1. Mitchem v. Turner et al

2. Jurisdiction: United States (September 27, 2023)
3. Victims<![CDATA[Jerry Mitchem]]>Defendants<![CDATA[Marshall Turner]]>Plaintiffs<![CDATA[Jerry Mitchem]]>Investigators<![CDATA[无]]>Prosecutors<![CDATA[无]]>Defense Attorneys<![CDATA[无]]>Plaintiff Attorneys<![CDATA[无]]>Judges<![CDATA[James M. Moody Jr.]]>Institutions<![CDATA[United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas]]><![CDATA[Arkansas Department of Corrections]]>
4. Case Tags: Prisoner Civil Rights;Excessive Force;42 U.S.C. § 1983;Eighth Amendment