Constitutional Rights

Constitutional arguments requiring state court exhaustion before federal review

1. Supreme Court Toilet Facilities Rights Case

2. Jurisdiction: India (2025)
3. Original Case: 最高法院法院厕所设施权利案
4. Victims<![CDATA[无]]>Defendants<![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Administration]]>Plaintiffs<![CDATA[Shikha Sharma]]>Investigators<![CDATA[无]]>Prosecutors<![CDATA[无]]>Defense Attorneys<![CDATA[Attorney General of India]]>Plaintiff Attorneys<![CDATA[Shikha Sharma]]>Judges<![CDATA[Chief Justice of India]]><![CDATA[Judge S. Ravindra Bhat]]>Institutions<![CDATA[Supreme Court of India]]><![CDATA[Ministry of Law and Justice]]>
5. Case Tags: Public Interest Litigation;Gender Equality;Constitutional Rights;Infrastructure

1. 兰卡斯特诉帕克特等人案

2. Jurisdiction: United States (November 16, 2023)
3. Original Case: Lancaster v. Puckett et al
4. DefendantsRon PuckettPlaintiffsLewis DeShaun LancasterJudgesMadeline Hughes HaikalaInstitutionsUnited States District Court for the Northern District of AlabamaAttorney General of the State of Alabama
5. Case Tags: Habeas Corpus;Exhaustion of Remedies;Constitutional Rights;Prisoner Litigation