Insurance Subrogation

A legal dispute over the scope of an insurer's right to recover payments from a liable third party.

State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance Company v. Jerry Tidwell Construction Inc et al
  1. State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance Company v. Jerry Tidwell Construction Inc et al
  2. Jurisdiction: United States (September 28, 2023)
  3. Victims<![CDATA[无]]>Defendants<![CDATA[Jerry Tidwell Construction Inc.]]><![CDATA[Jerry Tidwell]]>Plaintiffs<![CDATA[State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance Company]]>Investigators<![CDATA[无]]>Prosecutors<![CDATA[无]]>Defense Attorneys<![CDATA[无]]>Plaintiff Attorneys<![CDATA[无]]>Judges<![CDATA[无]]>Institutions<![CDATA[State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance Company]]><![CDATA[Jerry Tidwell Construction Inc.]]><![CDATA[United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi]]>
  4. Case Tags: Insurance Subrogation;Construction Defect;Negligence;Summary Judgment
Supreme Court: Insurer's Paid Solatium and Non-covered Medical Expenses Excluded from Indemnity Claim
  1. Supreme Court: Insurer's Paid Solatium and Non-covered Medical Expenses Excluded from Indemnity Claim
  2. Jurisdiction: South Korea (2026-05-20)
  3. Original Case: 대법 "보험사가 지급한 위자료·비급여 치료비, 구상금서 빼야"
  4. InstitutionsKorean Supreme CourtInsurance Company
  5. Case Tags: Insurance Subrogation;Non-covered Medical Expenses;Solatium;South Korea Supreme Court
Travelers Personal Insurance Company, The v. Techtronic Industries Factory Outlets, Inc.
  1. Travelers Personal Insurance Company, The v. Techtronic Industries Factory Outlets, Inc.
  2. Jurisdiction: United States (federal district court, likely District of Connecticut) (March 4, 2026 (complaint filing date))
  3. Key Figures: Travelers Personal Insurance Company (as subrogee of John and Jane Doe); Techtronic Industries Factory Outlets, Inc. (manufacturer of RYOBI-brand power tool)
  4. Case Tags: Product Liability;Insurance Subrogation;Defective Power Tool;Residential Fire Loss
Supreme Court Rules Insurer&apos;s Solatium and Non-Benefit Medical Expenses Excluded from Indemnity Claims
  1. Supreme Court Rules Insurer&apos;s Solatium and Non-Benefit Medical Expenses Excluded from Indemnity Claims
  2. Jurisdiction: South Korea (2026-05-20)
  3. Original Case: 대법 &quot;보험사가 지급한 위자료·비급여 치료비, 구상금서 빼야&quot;
  4. Key Figures: Insurance Company (Appellant); Injured Victim (Third-Party Beneficiary); Tortfeasor
  5. Case Tags: Insurance Subrogation;Damage Compensation;Non-Benefit Medical Expenses;Solatium Dispute