All
Novels
Cases
Us&Eur
Cn
Jp&Kr
Oth
Card
Card
Medical Necessity Litigation
Legal battles defining what constitutes medically necessary treatment under modern health plans.
Loftus v. Optum Services, Inc.
Jurisdiction
: United States (March 27, 2026)
Victims
Sarah Loftus
Defendants
Optum Services, Inc.
Plaintiffs
Sarah Loftus
Investigators
Federal Trade Commission Bureau of Consumer Protection
Defense Attorneys
Michael D. Hatcher
Plaintiff Attorneys
Jonathan C. Singer
Judges
Judge Ana C. Reyes
Institutions
United States District Court for the District of Minnesota
Optum Services, Inc.
UnitedHealth Group
Case Tags
:
Algorithmic Denial of Care
;
ERISA Breach of Fiduciary Duty
;
Healthcare Fraud
;
Medical Necessity Litigation
All
Novels
Cases
Us&Eur
Cn
Jp&Kr
Oth