Human Rights and Healthcare
The fundamental rights dimension of equitable access to specialized medical training and its consequent effect on the right to health under Article 21.
Supreme Court Medical PG Quota Unconstitutionality Case
- Jurisdiction: India (2025-04-15)
- Original Case: Supreme Court Advocate-on-Record Association v. Union of India (Medical PG Quota)
- Victims<![CDATA[无]]>Defendants<![CDATA[Union of India]]><![CDATA[National Medical Commission]]><![CDATA[Directorate General of Health Services]]>Plaintiffs<![CDATA[Supreme Court Advocate-on-Record Association]]><![CDATA[Federation of Resident Doctors' Association of India]]>Investigators<![CDATA[无]]>Prosecutors<![CDATA[无]]>Defense Attorneys<![CDATA[Solicitor General Tushar Mehta]]><![CDATA[Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati]]>Plaintiff Attorneys<![CDATA[Senior Advocate Vikas Singh]]><![CDATA[Senior Advocate Indira Jaising]]>Judges<![CDATA[Chief Justice Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud]]><![CDATA[Justice Hima Kohli]]><![CDATA[Justice J.B. Pardiwala]]>Institutions<![CDATA[Supreme Court of India]]><![CDATA[National Medical Commission]]><![CDATA[Federation of Resident Doctors' Association of India]]>
- Case Tags: Constitutional Law;Medical Education Reform;Reservation Policy Litigation;Human Rights and Healthcare